Paige Shiver Opens Up About Coach Moore's Control

Paige Shiver has broken her silence for the first time since the dramatic downfall of former University of Michigan football coach Sherrone Moore, sharing a powerful and deeply personal account of the alleged manipulation she endured. In an exclusive interview scheduled to air Friday morning on Good Morning America, Shiver provides candid details about what she describes as Moore's pervasive control over multiple aspects of her life, from her emotional well-being to her professional athletic career.

The interview marks a significant moment in an unfolding scandal that has shaken the University of Michigan athletics department and raised serious questions about power dynamics in collegiate sports. Moore's firing and subsequent sentencing represented a major turning point in the case, but Shiver's upcoming appearance signals a new chapter where the alleged victim is taking control of her own narrative. ABC released preliminary excerpts of the interview on Thursday, offering glimpses into the emotional weight of Shiver's experiences and her willingness to speak publicly about the ordeal.

In the excerpts disclosed by the network, Shiver articulates the depth of Moore's influence with striking clarity. "He had complete control over me," she states directly, establishing the central theme of her account. The former coach, she explains, wielded authority not just over professional matters but over her psychological and emotional state. "My emotions, my career … and he knew that, and he used it against me," Shiver reveals, indicating a deliberate pattern of manipulation rather than isolated incidents.

The revelation that Moore allegedly used knowledge of Shiver's emotional vulnerabilities as a tool for control and manipulation suggests a calculated approach to maintaining power in their relationship. This type of psychological manipulation is a recognized form of abuse that extends beyond physical harm, targeting a person's sense of agency and self-worth. Shiver's willingness to characterize her experience in these terms demonstrates her understanding of the dynamics at play and her commitment to naming them publicly.

Details regarding the nature and frequency of Moore's contact with Shiver are also expected to feature prominently in the full interview. The excerpts hint at repeated contact that went beyond what would be considered appropriate professional interaction between a coach and player. Such persistent communication patterns, especially when coupled with attempts at emotional control, can create an environment where the person being targeted feels unable to establish healthy boundaries or refuse unwanted attention.

The timing of Shiver's interview comes at a critical moment when public awareness of misconduct in collegiate athletics remains elevated. Universities across the country are being scrutinized for how they handle reports of inappropriate relationships between authority figures and athletes under their supervision. Moore's case has become emblematic of failures in institutional oversight and the challenges athletes face in reporting misconduct against powerful figures in their sport.

Shiver's decision to participate in a national television interview reflects growing recognition that survivors of manipulation and abuse deserve platforms to share their experiences. By agreeing to appear on Good Morning America, she positions herself not as a passive victim but as an active participant in the public discourse surrounding her case. Her interview has the potential to influence how the broader public and institutional decision-makers understand the nuances of coercive control in sports environments.

The University of Michigan's handling of this situation has faced significant scrutiny since Moore's initial removal from his position. Institutional responses to allegations of inappropriate conduct have become increasingly important to student-athletes and their families when evaluating the safety and integrity of athletic programs. The university's actions, or perceived inactions, in this case have contributed to broader conversations about accountability in collegiate athletics and the responsibility institutions bear in protecting their athletes from abuse.

Moore's sentencing represented the legal conclusion of criminal proceedings, but Shiver's interview suggests that the human and emotional dimensions of this case continue to unfold. Her public testimony may serve multiple purposes: providing catharsis for her own healing process, offering validation to other potential victims, and contributing to the evidentiary record of how coaching relationships can be weaponized to exploit vulnerable individuals. The interview's airing on a major network program ensures that Shiver's account will reach millions of viewers.

The specifics of how Moore allegedly maintained control over Shiver's career decisions are particularly significant for understanding the full scope of the abuse. Coaches occupy positions of extraordinary power in athletes' lives, controlling playing time, training opportunities, scholarship status, and career advancement prospects. When this legitimate authority is weaponized for personal gain or gratification, it creates a situation where athletes cannot easily resist or escape without jeopardizing their athletic futures.

Shiver's account also reflects broader patterns documented in research on abuse dynamics in hierarchical relationships. The ability to control someone's emotions—to manipulate their fear, hope, shame, or devotion—creates a psychological hold that can be more powerful than overt coercion. By explicitly naming this emotional manipulation, Shiver contributes to public understanding of how abuse operates in contexts where the authority figure has structural power over the victim's well-being.

The Friday morning broadcast will provide the full context for Shiver's statements, allowing her to elaborate on specific incidents and the cumulative impact of Moore's behavior. Viewers will gain deeper insight into her experience, the decision-making process that led to her coming forward, and her reflections on this challenging period. The interview represents an important step in ensuring that Shiver's voice is heard directly, rather than filtered through summary or interpretation.

As this story continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the importance of institutional accountability and athlete protection in collegiate sports. Shiver's courage in speaking publicly may inspire other athletes who have experienced similar situations to come forward, potentially uncovering additional concerns within Michigan's athletics program or other institutions. The interview represents not just a personal moment for Shiver, but a potential catalyst for systemic change.

The detailed discussion of repeated contact and patterns of control that Shiver plans to share will add substantive evidence to the public record about how Moore operated and what mechanisms he employed to maintain dominance in his relationship with her. These specifics matter both for understanding this particular case and for helping other institutions recognize warning signs of inappropriate coaching relationships before they escalate.

Friday's Good Morning America broadcast will mark a turning point in how this story is understood and remembered. Rather than being defined solely by institutional responses or legal proceedings, the narrative will now center on Shiver's own voice and experience. Her willingness to share details about the emotional and professional toll of Moore's control offers a human perspective that statistics and official statements cannot capture.