Meta Seeks SCOTUS Piracy Ruling to Avoid AI Data Torrent Lawsuit

Meta hopes a recent Supreme Court decision on ISP liability for piracy will help it defeat a lawsuit over torrenting AI training data.
Meta is hoping the recent Supreme Court ruling that found Internet service providers aren't liable for piracy on their networks will help the social media giant dodge liability claims over its torrenting of AI training data.
Last week, Meta filed a statement in a lawsuit that alleged the company should be liable under copyright law for contributory infringement simply because it knows how torrenting works. By seeding perhaps 80 terabytes of pirated works, the company allegedly knew it was inducing infringement by allowing uploads to help speed up its downloads, the plaintiffs, Entrepreneur Media, argued.
This contributory infringement claim is much easier to prove than a separate claim raised in a class action filed by book authors in Kadrey v. Meta, which alleged that Meta's torrenting meant it was liable for a "distribution" claim of direct copyright infringement. TorrentFreak reported on the latest development in the legal battle.
The Supreme Court's recent ruling in a case involving Sony found that ISPs cannot be held liable for copyright infringement committed by their users. Meta is hoping this precedent will help it avoid liability in the Entrepreneur Media lawsuit, which alleges the company's torrenting activities constitute contributory infringement.
However, legal experts note that the Supreme Court's ruling focused on ISPs, and it remains to be seen how it will apply to a platform like Meta that is more directly involved in the alleged infringement. The Entrepreneur Media lawsuit argues that Meta's knowledge and facilitation of the torrenting activities goes beyond the ISP liability addressed by the Supreme Court.
The case highlights the ongoing legal challenges around the use of copyrighted material for AI training purposes. While Meta has defended its actions, claiming the torrented data was necessary for its AI research, critics argue the company's methods violated copyright law and harmed content creators.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the AI industry and the way companies like Meta approach data acquisition for their machine learning models. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, the debate over the ethical and legal boundaries of AI development remains a critical issue for both the tech industry and policymakers.
Source: Ars Technica


